Ridder waived

He needed to be cut to many things wrong to fix.

And we got nothing at the position after cutting Dobbs. Meanwhile now I think PJ Walker having been cut by the Seahawks would be worth a shot as I'd feel better about three QB's on the roster and Walker has veteran experience. I recall how well he played against us as a rookie.

Gambo is reporting that Michael Carter is signing BACK with the Cards on the PS as is LB K. Barnes so all of the most surprising cuts cleared waivers apparently.  98.7 is talking about all Cardinal cuts have cleared waivers except for LB Nowaske who is back with the Lions.

P.S. Late find - OL Marquis Hayes has been signed to PS 

Oh maybe I missed that......I don't know.

I bring this up more out of amusement than anything else.

Way before the draft. Some of us was talking about AI and experimenting with what it could do.

I asked it....Who should the Cardinal's draft? I can't remember all its suggestions, but I do remember Spencer Rattler being one of them....an easy name to remember so it stuck with me.

At the time, I knew nothing about him or any other college player...I don't follow college ball, but as said, the name stuck with me.

Now I see he is getting glowing reviews, and some think he will be starting before the season is over. He was drafted in the 5th round.

This is all hindsight, but could we have gotten a 5th round pick for Rondal Moore? I don't know, even if not, he does seem to be a steel in the 5th round.

You can take this for what you will. This is just one article of many kind of saying the same thing.

New Orleans Saints rookie QB Spencer Rattler massively hyped by NFL expert

I don't think AI is good enough yet to predict these kinds of things, but it wasn't wrong about him.

It's kind of funny but interesting none the less.

People who research and write for a living may find AI a timesaver. Good or bad, I am seeing AI increasingly on the Forum. The chosen AI algorithm can spit out colorful prose faster than a 2-year-old squirting his mac & cheese across the family dinner table. But is the product valued? It depends on one's taste.

I recently experimented with Microsoft Co-Pilot, resetting language to be more grammatically precise. The tool asked me to do an experiment. I thought it odd that a computer was asking me to engage it (Hal liked to play games on the space station--how did that turn out for the crew?). I complied. Then, I thought I got suckered. Rather than being the dominant partner, I was the slave to the AI algorithm.

Now, I can't ignore the not-so-subtle Co-Pilot cues to 'correct' and 'improve' my messaging. I accept the suggestions. I am aware that my messaging is grammatically correct. What is lost when I say 'yes, accept the change' is my writing style disappears. My bias is eliminated. Sometimes, I want to be me when I write and share a 'biased' thought. I don't always want to be socially correct.

I can't get another thought out of my head: the writer who criticized the Cardinals for cutting Ridder may have been playing an all-too-familiar social justice card when the HC did not choose Ridder to be Murray's #2. The evidence lies in the writer's assessment that Ridder earned #2 based on work done at ATL in 2023 and that Tune failed in his sole outing vs. CLE in 2023. The writer appears to discount what the QBs have done for the team in 2024.

IMHO (like Knobby says)

 “Sorry, I cannot comment on that topic right now” ...